Reebok Nano Golf Performance Review

The Reebok Nano line has been a mainstay in CrossFit gyms for over 15 years. Now the Reebok Nano Golf takes the franchise out of the gym and onto the golf course. But let’s figure out why Reebok has gone this direction before we get to the review.

Just a few years ago, Bryson DeChambeau was arguably one of the most hated golfers of all time. But like him or hate him, he will NOT be denied. He now has 2.8 million Instagram followers, 1.9 million subscribers on YouTube, and a U.S. Open trophy sitting somewhere in his mansion over which he tries to make holes-in-one.

When Reebok announced that Bryson was going to become the face of Reebok Golf in March of 2025, I was thrilled to see what would be coming our way. Well the Reebok Nano Golf Shoe answers that question. And it’s simple, clean, and ready for the course. Just how golf shoes should be.

If Bryson can wear the Reebok Nano Golf at Augusta during The Masters, I can easily rock them while I’m shooting 15 over at my local club. Without giving too many spoilers away, this is now one of my favorite golf shoes and will remain in my rotation.

Let’s dive in!

Fit

A flawless fit starts my Reebok Nano Golf Shoes performance review off with a bang. As someone with average-width feet, I’d order your normal size if you’re in a similar boat as the fit was great for me.

In my opinion, the Reebok Nano Golf should fit our wide-footed readers pretty well. But since there is no wide option available, I’d still recommend trying on at your local store (if possible) to be absolutely sure. The Question Golf caused some issues when it came to the collar lining, but I thankfully didn’t experience any similar issues with the Nano Golf.

Traction

Rubberized, spikeless traction on the bottom of the Reebok Nano Golf = the industry standard for pretty average traction.

There’s nothing special here in the grip department, but the rubberized lugs, which are set up in a sort of wave pattern, will get the job done in drier climates with little to no moisture. I felt adequate traction with every shot, including tougher bunker shots where I had to focus on my footing. But like with the majority of rubberized traction, you’ll notice some slippage with wet conditions.

So the traction is average but adequate!

Cushion

I wore the Reebok Nano Golf on and off the course, and my feet felt great.

The removable insole is thin but provides slight cushion, and we get Reebok’s Floatride foam midsole underneath that. Give the Nano Golf some time to break in for off-the-course wear since you don’t have the benefit of soft grass. But I personally never noticed any discomfort while walking on the actual golf course. The Floatride midsole provides a bouncier cushion; and when you mix that with the removable insole, you get a comfortable walking experience.

[Editor’s Note: Floatride is commonly found in Reebok’s performance running models like the Floatzig 1 and the Floatride Energy line, and our running review team has found similar results to Tyler. Floatride is a great foam that just needs a touch of break-in time before feeling fully optimized over harder surfaces.]

I’ll dive further into price shortly; but at this price point, you can’t pass up the cushion offered on the course with the Nano Golf.

Well done, Reebok!

Support

I’m especially susceptible to arch soreness and didn’t experience any with the Reebok Nano Golf on-foot, perhaps in part thanks to the stabilizing TPU Torsion Shank underfoot (along with that comfy Floatride cushioning). So I can confidently say that you’re likely safe from major arch pain with this as your golf shoe of choice.

The upper is FlexWeave with a fairly simplistic style and design, but it provided support and containment over the top and around my feet without causing too much claustrophobia within the shoe.

Otherwise, there aren’t any major gadgets or gizmos when it comes to the support features, but the Nano Golf Shoes are a solid contender that will get the job done thanks to their secure but comfortable fit.

Price

At $130, you’re basically robbing Reebok.

Put on your mask, call the getaway car, tip the driver, and RUN!

The Reebok Nano Golf is the best that Reebok has to offer. While Reebok Golf is in its early stages, I’d recommend this shoe regardless of how new Reebok may be to the space. Every round I played featured top-tier performance (apart from the average traction) and comfort that rewarded my feet.

I also wore the Nano Golf to work and other functions and felt like it made a good hybrid golf shoe, only adding to the value proposition.

Reebok Nano Golf Summary

I can confidently say that the Reebok Nano Golf is now one of my favorite golf shoes out of all the shoes that I’ve tested. 

I liked the overall style of the Nano Golf with the definite push for a newer and trendier look. This is the right move for Reebok considering the fact that the Question Golf and the OG Pump Golf are golf versions of basketball models released 20+ years ago.

[Editor’s Note: Though beloved models they are, especially around here. We also recognize the Nano didn’t just appear out of thin air either and in fact has a long legacy of its own – a legacy WearTesters has been a part of in reviewing countless Nano training models over the years.]

As is obvious by now, I have very little beef with the Reebok Nano Golf. The cushion was great on and off the course, and I found myself wearing the Nano Golf to work, church, and everywhere else I needed to go during my testing.

When you mesh together affordability, style, comfort, and decent traction, it typically means you’ve got a great shoe on your hands. And especially if hybrid performance/lifestyle golf shoes are your thing, the Reebok Nano Golf is a must have.

Buy at Reebok

How the Author Golfs

Tyler Allred (19 handicap): Golfs 2-3 times a week spending the bulk of his time playing actual rounds. Mostly pushes himself to improve every part of his game, but also enjoys a casual round of golf every now and then.

Disclosure

While Reebok did send a pair of the Nano Golf to facilitate this review, the company had no involvement in this review, didn’t receive an advance look at it, and has not attempted to influence it.